To the Editor

Rules for

thee, but

not for me

To the Editor:

Following the recent Assembly work session, I remain deeply disturbed by the suggestion that the Assembly should interrupt a strictly private land transaction simply because neighboring property owners disagree with its intended use. This appears to be a classic example of “rules for thee, but not for me,” as current owners who enjoyed the freedom to develop their own land are now attempting to bar others from that same privilege.

I am further concerned that the Borough is suggesting and pushing for the exploration of other private land to house th...